Monthly Archives: December 2004

Parsnip’s Progress

Al and I have created the Graham Parsnip blog (http://sliceofparsnip.blogspot.com) as usual with me, using the Blogger system.

Parsnip is a spoof science fiction author, who first appeared on Palimpsest
(http://palimpsest.org.uk/phpBB2) earlier this year. But Al reckons the stuff is good enough to one day be turned into novel form. We’ll see. But having the blog means we can post content more quickly and keep the story rolling along, whilst cross-posting the bigger incidents to Palimpsest as ususal. But how to promote a made up blog by a made up person?

Also, what with it being narrative, people do need to start from the beginning and work their way up through the posts. Maybe we should make this clear somehow.

Advanced Firefox

Original: http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/12/02/1610202&from=rss

Internet
Firefox for power users
Wednesday December 08, 2004 (02:00 PM GMT)
By: Daniel Rubio

The Mozilla Firefox browser has garnered wide attention for its capabilities, compared to its predecessor Mozilla and Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. But in addition to its widely covered speed enhancements and robust security, Firefox offers a rich assortment of features that are not so evident upon installation.

Some of the features are aimed at easing the transition from other browsers. Old habits die hard, and everyone surfing the Net has his share of established behaviours. Firefox allows users to easily migrate old preferences set on other browsers in a few simple steps. By selecting the Import… option under the File menu, one can incorporate bookmarks, passwords, cookies, and other browser-related information used on Internet Explorer, Netscape, and Mozilla directly into Firefox.

Firefox can store Internet password information for use upon revisiting sites. You can manage this behaviour through the Saved Passwords option located in the Privacy tab under the Tools-Options menu, for Windows environments, or the Edit-Preferences menu for Linux installations.

To more security-conscious users, stored passwords are unacceptable, since another user who can access the browser can use the stored credentials without authentication. Firefox sets itself apart from other browsers offering the option of assigning a master password, which it requests before giving access to these stored user-password sets. If you close the browsing session the next user who invokes the program has to enter the password again. The master password can be assigned from the same menu used for administering passwords, with the Master Password option.

Catering to those whose major source of information is the web, Firefox can detect RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds of Web sites, a means by which content providers offer an up-to-the-minute snapshot of their most recent information. If a site you visit offers this technology, you will observe a small icon in the lower right corner. Clicking on it allows you to generate what is known as a Live Bookmark — a dynamic directory of links which are generated from a sites updated RSS feed, and which are also stored under Firefox’s Bookmarks menu.

Another area which has blossomed with the advent of Firefox’s final release is its Extensions — special add-ons developed by third parties that enhance a browser’s default capabilities. While toolbars produced by vendors like Google, Yahoo, and AOL are the norm on other browsers, Firefox open source developers have come up with grassroots extensions that fulfill even the most exotic user quirks.

If you are an avid Internet music listener, check out the FoxyTunes extension, which will allow you to integrate your media player controls under Firefox’s lower frame, streamlining the operation of your favorite player while surfing the Web. If downloading is your thing, the FlashGot extension can handle Net downloads through external download managers, allowing you to reuse your download software seamlessly with Firefox. These are just two examples out of more than 150 available.

To manage extensions in Firefox, select the Extensions option under the Tools menu. From there you can install, delete, and configure extensions, and also obtain information on available extensions.

As an example, let’s proceed with instructions on how to configure one especially useful extension — InfoRSS, which allows you to incorporate an RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feed for delivering headline updates — into Firefox.

After you install InfoRSS and restart Firefox, you’ll see a small world icon on the browser’s bottom frame. If you select it with your mouse, you will see a list of default RSS feeds from around the Net.

You can add an RSS feed into InfoRSS in two ways: You can visit the feed — as if it were a Web page — and drag and drop the address onto the small world icon. Or, you can wait for Firefox to detect an RSS feed automatically and add it as a Live Bookmark — as was mentioned previously. This places the RSS URL into the InfoRSS menu for later addition. Upon placement, InfoRSS will confirm the validity of the feed and later show it within the drop-down list.

To view the headlines from a specific RSS feed, simply select it from the menu. To eliminate a particular feed, just drag and drop the line onto the top option, as shown in the previous graphic. Additionally, you can also opt to fine tune the display on InfoRSS, such as the number of headlines appearing per feed, the refresh time and background colors, among other features, through the Options tab appearing in the Extensions pop-up window.

Themes are another Firefox feature that allow you to modify the browser’s look and feel. You can specify if you want to view cleaner-cut smaller-icon menus or special color variants, and you can modify your visual rendition depending on your mood or tastes. You manage Firefox themes from the Themes option under the Tools menu. A small pop-up window will appear, allowing you to install, update, select, and search alternate display themes.

All of these are some of the less commonly explored — although powerful — features offered by Firefox. With them, you can enhance your browsing experience while using this W3C standards-based browser.

Daniel Rubio is the principal consultant at Osmosis Latina, a firm specializing in enterprise software development, training, and consulting based in Mexico.

OpenOffice.org better than M$ Office?

Good article on choosing Openoffice.org over M$ Office (from http://www.pc-tools.net/comment/openoffice/ ) :

There are some very good reasons to use OpenOffice.org instead of Microsoft Office, and the best reasons have nothing to do with cost of the software.

Although I have regularly used Microsoft Office in the past, I haven’t even had it installed on my system for over a year. This is despite completing a thesis, working with legal documents, exchanging business documents, writing academic papers for publishing as well as creating software based presentations.

I have NOT needed MS Office to do any of these things. OpenOffice.org is adequate – it has all the essential features, including style list functions for real publishing, document comparison capabilities and import/export abilities, a capable spreadsheet, and a presentation program that does its job while importing and exporting PowerPoint.

But it’s not just that OpenOffice.org is “adequate” for the job. As a software developer and long time computer user, I think OpenOffice.org is superior in several important respects. I would like to describe these points, because I think that others will also understand the issues better
when they recognize the implications for themselves:

OpenOffice.org runs on multiple platforms. Currently: Windows, Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X. This is important because I use several operating systems, including Linux. It is a huge advantage for me to be able to work on the same documents under the same interface whether I have booted Linux, Windows, or whether I am using a thin Solaris workstation.

OpenOffice.org is stable, and runs smoothly. It has not crashed on me under Windows or Linux, and does not do wacky things. MS Word has scared me in the past with some of its flaky behaviour.

I trust the OpenOffice.org software and its developers; I may even contribute to the project myself! The office suite is open source, and the Internet community is heavily involved with improving Sun’s original software. You’re guaranteed to never experience licensing-related hassles (expired licenses, product registrations, lost keys, forced updates) which have occasionally caused much aggravation and lost productivity for MS Office users.

Data longevity: this is an important point, which is often overlooked because it’s really only an issue in the (distant?) future. Microsoft has made it clear that it wants proprietary document formats, and inconsistent ones at that. This may work as long as Microsoft is around and developing software that supports files created by outdated products. Personally, I’m more comfortable with my OpenOffice.org documents in XML format because I know that in the worst case scenario, I can unzip the document structure and easily extract text from the XML components. This is technical, but what it comes down to is: my data is easily accessible in the future. It is also easy for third party developers to write tools for OpenOffice documents.

Data interchange: this builds on the previous point. MS uses proprietary document formats and seems unwilling to allow seamless data flow between different software from independent vendors. It’s just not in their best interest. OpenOffice.org uses data formats designed to be easily interchanged (OASIS specification), and other projects are cooperating with the vision of open document interchange – e.g. Abiword, and KOffice.

Now, given the rapid worldwide growth and popularity of open source software, including OpenOffice.org, do you really think you’re better off locking your documents into an inflexible, non-interchangeable format (MS Word version X)? I would argue that for anyone who values document longevity and interchange, it’s in their best interest to use software based on open
data formats.

After all: software companies die, but information lasts forever. If a company takes the secrets of unlocking your data to its grave, where will that leave you?