Tuesday, 24 February, 2026

Harry Metcalfe shares a cautionary tale of vibe coding and security:

But the arrival of these tools has – like all development tools that help get more done more easily – raised the security stakes. Tools like Lovable make building and deploying new websites trivial. In this case, one that collects personal data from real people: names, email addresses, postcodes, political opinions. They produce code that works, that looks professional, and that will pass a cursory glance from someone who isn’t a security specialist. But sometimes – often enough that it matters – they are built wide open and the tools don’t go to the trouble of checking, or telling you.

The legendary email client power users wouldn’t let die:

Eudora was, from the very beginning, quirky software built for power users. Like a film director who respects their audience, skipping over exposition and letting them fill in the blanks. It’s not an approach that works for every app or newsletter or whatever else you’re creating. But when it works, people fight to keep your work alive.

Mist is an ephemeral, collaborative markdown editor in the browser. Handy!

Monday, 23 February, 2026

📅 Weeknote w/e Friday 20 February 2026

Short week last week as I took a couple of days off for half term. Also, I need to get into the habit of writing these during the week they actually refer to.

This week’s worky highlights:

  • Some more Skillstats demos, which were as helpful to me as they were those on the receiving end. Some great challenge around accessibility which I need to look into.
  • Am doing some thinking around combined / strategic authorities and their potential role in supporting collaboration and innovation between councils and, eventually, other place based services as well. I think there’s a thing here, and there’s not a huge amount of conversation out in the open about it.
  • As part of the above, I got Google’s Notebook LM to do some of the heavy lifting in terms of research for me, which has been a real time saver.
  • Well over 50 people signed up for LGR Camp, which is great progress!

Not really work stuff:

  • I’ve been nagging people on LinkedIn to try and post the interesting things they put on there on the open web as well. Most people respond graciously, but I don’t want to become annoying about it!
  • Ironically, I feel I am in the opposite boat where I publish things here on my blog on the open web but am not sure anybody is reading them! Need to find a way to non-annoyingly repost them on the social spaces, which is weirdly tricky when you don’t use post titles very often. Am encouraging people to sign up to get posts emailed to them, but not many folk are biting on that right now.

Media consumption:

  • Watched The Seven Dials on Netflix which was enjoyable but felt weirdly paced. I think either make it a single feature or at least a 6 parter?
  • Some classic daft comedies got watched with the kids – Dodgeball, Blades of Glory, etc. More fun for me than the kids I think, who senses of humour appear to be more sophisticated than mine!
  • I had a load of half finished books on my Kindle, so I polished those off, which gave me a sene of achievement.

Here’s a photo of one of our cats, Wallis, sitting very properly on the sofa:

Wallis the cat

Doug Belshaw – I needed a scheduling tool that respects privacy. So I built one:

Scheduler reads iCal feeds, so it works with Proton Calendar or any service supporting iCal/CalDAV standards. It doesn’t store calendar data, instead checking availability in real-time and creating events only when someone books.

People are using AI assistants to code all sorts of useful things. Doug is investigating turning this into a service, which is I think the tricky bit with the code these things are generating.

Emily Webber – A New Communities of Practice Model for Organisational Maturity:

This new model focuses on organisational maturity at five levels from low awareness to self-sustaining and setting standards across six dimensions (structure, culture, collaboration, support, technology and impact). It will be useful for people leading and facilitating cross-organisational communities of practice initiatives.

Thursday, 19 February, 2026

Tom Loosemore published some thoughts about public services and AI on LinkedIn:

Many public services rely on friction to stay viable. They depend on slow, confusing, frustrating user experiences to put off those otherwise eligible. This is both unfair and politically convenient. You could say ‘twas ever thus’. Until now.

From parents seeking special needs support to property owners appealing council tax bands, it’s often the friction of bad service design that restrains demand, not the law.

AI – specifically AI agents – will remove that friction. Your AI agent will be doggedly relentless in how they access public services, however byzantine. They’ll make sure your application is perfectly crafted to maximise your chances of getting what you want, treating any appeals process as just another stage to be navigated by all.

Well worth a read in full.

Update: good news, Tom pointed out to me rhat this post (and indeed a load of his recent writing which I have only seen on LinkedIn) is on a blog on the open web.

Missed this first time around, but there’s some interesting stuff to think about in here – Courage is required for GDS Local to succeed.

There is currently both a real opportunity and a grave danger facing local government in England from the confluence of technological and governance considerations. The opportunity is to use the forthcoming governance changes to review the current fragmentation of approaches and consolidate both operating models and their enabling technology stacks. The danger is that the governance changes will absorb the available leadership bandwidth and will actually significantly delay the digital transformation of the local government sector.

Wednesday, 18 February, 2026

Claire Craig from the Essex Digital Service on User research in libraries: finding the voices between the bookshelves

We’re currently working through a research project, exploring Essex residents’ thoughts and feelings about AI being used in public services. We’ve recruited research participants for online and in-person one-to-one interviews, and the sessions are well underway and proving to be hugely insightful.

And whilst we’re deeply grateful for every single participant who answers the online recruitment call, project after project after project falls short of reaching a demographically representative sample. They are somewhat self-selecting – you’ll reach the highly engaged, the digitally literate, the loud and confident voices (sometimes, the squeakiest wheel). You have to go further to find the complete set of user voices.