Internet

My Thoughts on GDS 2 Beta, & a Web OS

Having been playing and thinking about the new Google Desktop Search, and specifically its new sidebar form, I have the following few thoughts.

Firstly, like all Google innovations, it’s US only at the moment, content wise. This means that the news and weather info is restricted to the States, which is useless for the rest of us. Plus, the News items which appear are of dubious relevancy to me. I guess this will improve over time, but it would be nice to be able to select specific areas of interest from the outset.

The webclips idea is nice, but I would prefer to see it working as it does on the Google Portal rather than along the small scale Gmail lines. I guess space is an issue here, but the tiny previews are of limited use – plus links don’t seem to work and images aren’t loaded.

In terms of size, though, in many ways I would like the sidebar to be a lot bigger. In fact, make it the size of the whole screen and call it Google Desktop, or even Google OS. Launching apps by typing in (part of) the name is brilliant, so much quicker than mucking about with Start menus, or having to manage the contents of an ever-expanding quick launch toolbar. On a full screen version, you shouldn’t even have to click into the little box to type in what you want. You should be able to just type, hit return and have the application appear in front of you. A little like Jeff Raskin‘s Archy.

It could be made even easier to use, so that you wouldn’t need to know the name of the program you want. Say your installed word processor is OpenOffice.org Writer. You could type ‘letter’ and it loads up your word processor, as the word letter is tagged to the word processor. If you have more than one installed, it could offer a choice. Likewise, ’email’ would offer up Thunderbird, or Outlook and ‘web’ a whole host of browsers and other apps. ‘Chat’ would call up IM and IRC clients that the user has installed. All the talk, of course, is that Google are going to release their own IM client tomorrow. A system like this would retain the speed of a command line with ease-of-use.

With a full-screen to play with, much more information could be displayed – somewhat akin to the current Google Portal, but with local information displayed too.

Going through my RSS feeds on FeedDemon, I notice Jason Kottke has written with far more authority about a similar idea here. More intriguing thoughts on this issue are reported by Microsoft Monitor.

Google Sidebar

Google Sidebar is part of the new version 2 of Desktop Search.

It works pretty much like Desktop Sidebar, but obviously with all Google services involved. It features an email preview pane, which will pick up your Gmail, if you have an account – it also indexes your whole archived account, so you can search for emails even when you are offline.

Another great feature is the ability to display RSS feeds as ‘Web Clips’ – similar to the way some Gmail accounts do – and you can use the search box to quickly find and run applications too: just typing in ‘Firefox’ will boot up the browser for you. More details of the new features are here.

Some views on this from the web:

More to come as I come across them.

BBC ‘punks’ Wikipedia?

Saw this on Slashdot:

An article over at BoingBoing discusses what appears to be a viral marketing ploy appearing in a Wikipedia entry. Quote: “Someone has apparently abused collaborative reference site Wikipedia in a viral marketing campaign for a BBC online alternate reality game.

The BoingBoing article states:

…In fairness, it is also possible for any individual unaffiliated with the BBC (or an employee acting without network approval) to create a Wikipedia entry on their own. Comments on the Wikipedia “talk” page for this entry, however, suggest that a related entry for a fictional band called “Boy*d Upp” were added from someone operating inside the BBC’s network.

So, some questions: is a person (or persons) acting on behalf of the BBC responsible? What will happen to the entry, if it is indeed a bogus publicity entry? How often does this sort of thing happen?

One thing I do know: Wikipedia tends to be hastily self-correcting. Bogus or erroneous information of any kind doesn’t tend to last long there.

Further updates state that:

The corresponding discussion page now includes mea culpas from persons responsible for two of the bogus entries. One of them, “Jon_Hawk,” identifies himself as someone unaffiliated with the BBC who just digs the game.

Please do not use my edits to slander the BBC. If this were part of a viral campaign, the grammar of the article would almost certainly be better. I suspect the article would have been created at the same time as the game started also. Jamie Kane was mentioned on several blogs on Friday – did not one of you consider it was created by someone who reads such things? I’m nothing more than a student. I’m sincerely apologetic for purposefully omitting the true nature of Jamie Kane.

But the other, “MattC,” identifies himself as a BBC employee:

I created the Boy*D_Upp page from inside the BBC network on Friday evening after stumbling across the Jamie Kane entry linked from the Pop Justice forums. My action was in no way part of an orchestrated marketing campaign on behalf of the Jamie Kane project team nor was it intended for my page to be attributed to the BBC, which has been implied. It was nothing more than common garden vandalism for which I am sorry.

I take two things from this. One: traditional media organisations need to be careful how they use the new methods wikis and blogs present to promote their own output, as credibility can be lost fast. Secondly: community sites such as these are very quick to spot spamming, marketing and suchlike, and are very quick to stamp down on it.

Over on Palimpsest we have had a couple of issues with authors falsely reviewing their own work. We have come to be pretty good at spotting this sort of thing, and once exposed, these people tend to disappear very quickly. Those who populate the ‘net are pretty savvy people, it would appear.

Link icon

This afternoon, I ‘designed’ a quite frankly rubbish link icon for this blog, in the style of the little rectangles one sees on many blogs, including this one. Here it is:

closed circle link icon

The font is Jason Kottke’s Silkscreen, perfect for this kind of small scale work.

Load more posts!