[RL] The problem with local government software

Original post from Gavin Beckett

With a very small number of exceptions, the established local government technology market is populated by companies that fundamentally do not understand user research.

They do not start with user needs or design great user experiences. And they do not use the tools and techniques of the internet age to deliver working software rapidly, so that real users get value from it quickly and iteratively.

I wrote a little while ago that the software market for local government is one of the things holding back the success of transformation in the sector. Gavin argues the point well in this post – it’s a fairly long read but worth the effort.

Why is local government software bad? Let me count the ways…

  • It’s hard to maintain, taking up huge resources to keep systems patched and updated
  • It’s siloed, with data unable to be meaningfully analysed and shared with other systems
  • It’s user hostile, with manuals in lever arch ring binders and training needed to do the most basic of operations
  • It’s hard to access, often hosted in council data centres, requiring the use of council equipment and connecting technology like Citrix to get anything done

I’m a little glum on this topic. My fear is that there are a couple of things holding back progress. The first is that the market for local government software isn’t big enough to provide the necessary reward for the investment needed to fix it. Second is that the develop challenge isn’t particularly exciting and thus the vendors struggle to attract the talent needed to make really great software.

One solution is for government to write its own software, although that would mean organisations bringing resources together in a way that hasn’t been particularly productive in the past.

Alternatively, councils could make a shared commitment to bring budget together to pump prime an incumbent or a new supplier. This though would almost certainly mean paying twice for a while whilst the new system is developed.

I’m not convinced either of the above are going to happen soon though. In the meantime, we must try to procure as well as we can, and try to hold suppliers to the standards we set ourselves for our own services.

2 thoughts on “[RL] The problem with local government software”

  1. What about a local government “web farm” (or cloud), with all council and citizen services delivered via SaaS? Maybe the LGA might support, sponsor or even fund such a bold scheme, particularly given the potential savings?

  2. Hi David. Great post. I don’t know you but was directed here via a debate on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/activity:6368410114726064128/ We think the solution is right here https://www.rapid-is.co.uk – it’s an open source drag and drop app builder for responsive web apps, offline hybrid mobile apps, and forms. We have been working with a select number of London local authorities for a few years now and are looking for more exposure. Rapid is perfect for putting attractive integrated UI on legacy systems – we bring the tools for authorities to easily create their own software solutions which they share with each other.

Comments are closed.