local government

šŸ“… Daily Note: September 23, 2025

Building understanding of software markets in local government from the Local Digital team:

Weā€™ve also identified through roundtable discussions and feedback from partners that managing effective procurements and successfully exiting technology contracts is a challenge, particularly where internal capacity or capability is limited.

With local government reorganisation, new unitary authorities will need to consolidate systems, migrate data, and harmonise business processes at an unprecedented scale. This will also impact technology contracts and procurement activities.

# – micropost 23056

Foundational Specification to support the procurement of social care Case Management Systems:

The Department of Health and Social Care has released a Foundational Specification to support the procurement of social care Case Management Systems (CMSs). Developed in partnership with BetterGov, the Specification is the outcome of a multi-stage consultation process involving a wide range of stakeholders. Its primary aim is to simplify the procurement journey for Local Authorities by providing a clear and consistent guideā€”helping to reduce the time, cost, and resources required when selecting new CMSs.

# – micropost 23057

Endel – via Matt Mullenweg – is an interesting idea, offering “[p]ersonalized soundscapes to help you focus, relax, and sleep. Backed by neuroscience.”

I definitely work better when I have the right music playing – but Ā£60 is too steep when i already have Apple Music and a bunch of suitable playlists identified.

# – micropost 23059

# – micropost 23060

Why WordPress Lost the Cool Kids (And How to Win Them Back):

Hereā€™s what nobody talks about: WordPress is actually modern. REST API, GraphQL, headless implementations, React-based editing. It powers complex applications and handles millions of visitors. But everyone still thinks itā€™s ā€œjust for blogs.ā€

The platform regularly outperforms competitors on speed, but gets labeled as ā€œslow and bloated.ā€ Enterprise teams at Sony and Microsoft chose WordPress deliberatelyā€”these arenā€™t legacy installations.

WordPress has Full Site Editing and visual builders that compete with Webflow. They just feel hidden behind confusing historical interfaces.

# – micropost 23061

Another newsletter sent. Am pleased to be getting back into a fortnightly rhythm.

Some delivery issues though, need to have a look at my DNS records to ensure I have them set correctly.

If you’d like to sign up, you can do so!

# – micropost 23062

It isn’t altogether obvious how to send an email to the attendees of an upcoming Zoom meeting, without exporting their details and sending a normal email, which seems sub-optimal.

# – micropost 23063

The core problem in local government digital is capacity

This is the content of the ‘article’ element of the email newsletter I sent last week. Publishing here for posterity.

2025 has been a pretty tumultuous year in local government digital, largely due to the impact of the Localism bill in late 2024 and the imminent (and indeed immanent) prospect of local government reorganisation. Following the latest cabinet reshuffle, it feels like the ambitions might be being dialled back a little (note: I have no special insight other than what I read online), which probably isn’t a bad thing.
I can’t help but feel that some kind of coming together is required if the sector is to get the most out of the digital opportunity. I’ve been lucky enough to be involved in several research projects in the last year looking at some of the the big picture stuff, and to me the issue ofĀ capacityĀ seems to be screaming out as the fundamental issue facing council digital teams across the country.
  • Local government software is largely terrible because nobody has the time to put the effort into demanding and buying something better.
  • Local government data is in a poorly maintained mess because nobody has the time to sort it out.
  • Local government websites are still full of unintelligible content and PDF forms because nobody has the time to get round to fixing it.
I could go on (but don’t have the time, LOL!) but you get my point – many of the oft-cited root causes of digital incompetence actually have a root cause themselves –Ā capacity.
Have hundreds of councils trying to do the same thing, over and over again, is nuts, and there could have been some potential in using the LGR process to create some scalable teams to deal with the issue. Trouble is, LGR itself creates so much work that I dare say the opportunity wouldn’t be realised for some time.
I wrote a thing last autumnĀ about how councils could start sharing digital, data, and technology capabilitiesĀ in a way that doesn’t impact local policy setting or require huge sector-wide reform projects. Shared services have a bad rep in the sector, but it doesn’t have to be that way if we do things properly and take our time.
If LGR doesn’t end up happening as widely as once was expected, it would be nice to think that some of the conversations that have started up between digital people could still result in sharing capabilities, reducing burdens, and increasingĀ capacityĀ across the sector.

Localise Live! – monthly chats for local government folk

Join me for a light-hearted hour of sharing challenges, ideas, and experience about innovating in local public services.

Localise Live! takes place on the last Thursday of every month at 12pm until 1pm andĀ is open to public sector people only. The sessions take place on Zoom, so make sure you have it downloaded and up to date!

Don’t worry if you can’t make them all, just sign up and pop along when you can.

Some sessions will have a predetermined topic to discuss, which you will be emailed about, and others will feature guests to share their ideas and knowledge with us. Sometimes we will just busk it on the day!

Sign up now to bag your place and get all the sessions added to your calendar:Ā https://bit.ly/localiselive

See you there! šŸ˜€

On user groups for local government software

Have had a few conversations lately with local gov folk which bemoaned the lack of active user groups for most software systems. This is a problem! What could we do about it?

It seems like vendors are keen to say they have user groups, but then once the sale is made, less keen on convening them.

There’s real advantages in the people actually using software to get together to share insight, issues, collectivise around requests, and so on.

Is there a space, I wonder, for an independent user group as a service offering? Someone to provide a safe place for online discussions, organise regular meet-ups, do a bit of the admin, and maybe engage with the vendors to get them to turn up and so on. Question is probably ‘who pays?’.

Another little LinkedIn post / rant, which I am saving for posterity here.

šŸ“… Daily Note: June 5, 2025

Really helpful stuff from Jason Kitcat at the Department for Business and Trade on matrix working.

# – micropost 22920

# – micropost 22934

My general take these days is that the local gov software market isn’t necessarily broken – it’s probably doing what it is supposed to do, i.e. behaving like a market. The issues are symptoms of wider problems, largely lack of capability and capacity on the buy side.

# – micropost 22935

Ben Unsworth points out that I haven’t installed the free and open source Caffeine on my Mac. How foolish of me.

Have rectified that and will amend the post at some point to include it.

# – micropost 22936

Ben Holliday on ‘networked responsibility’:

Digital transformation has to be a people movement. And it has to be ā€˜of the internetā€™ in the way that itā€™s networked, open, and has the potential to self-sustain how ideas and solutions work in joined-up ways across systems and layers of government ā€“ networked responsibility is the role we all have as individual leaders in making this happen.

# – micropost 22937

Load more posts!