📅 Daily Note: December 2, 2025

Gavin Beckett – Harnessing the changing landscape of local government to create internet era organisations:

Effective responses to complex, long-standing social challenges need to be co-designed and co-produced with people and community organisations that grow from the ground up. Modern councils need new capabilities that enable them to work well with a constellation of partners, thinking about the network’s ability to create teams and services that wrap around the person and family, rather than assuming that the council must create top-down solutions themselves. They need to be effective conveners, brokers and collaborators in the ecosystem of the whole place.

# – micropost 23159


Atika writes One Year On: Building Digital Momentum in Luton:

Twelve months ago, I stepped into the Director of Digital, Data and Technology role with a clear set of ambitions and a determination to help Luton Council move forward on its digital journey. Looking back, the transformation has been both challenging and rewarding—and, most importantly, it’s been a team effort.

Working with her has been great!

# – micropost 23160


Paul Brown – Everything I Got Wrong About Product (So You Don’t Have To)

That’s when it hit me: the lessons I’d want my son to know are the same lessons I wish someone had told me — the ones that stop you wasting years pretending you know the future, chasing the wrong goals, or mistaking movement for progress.

(via Neilly Neil)

# – micropost 23161


Nice story on the LOTI blog about adapting open source components in the Drupal system to make an AI-powered PDF scraper to help create more accessible HTML content on council websites.

# – micropost 23163


Another one from the LOTI blog, this time it’s Rethinking how councils buy technology by Katy Beale:

Procurement isn’t just a list of features. It’s about user experience and has the opportunity to spark service transformation and design better public services.

Hear, hear.

# – micropost 23165


📅 Daily Note: September 23, 2025

Building understanding of software markets in local government from the Local Digital team:

We’ve also identified through roundtable discussions and feedback from partners that managing effective procurements and successfully exiting technology contracts is a challenge, particularly where internal capacity or capability is limited.

With local government reorganisation, new unitary authorities will need to consolidate systems, migrate data, and harmonise business processes at an unprecedented scale. This will also impact technology contracts and procurement activities.

# – micropost 23056


Foundational Specification to support the procurement of social care Case Management Systems:

The Department of Health and Social Care has released a Foundational Specification to support the procurement of social care Case Management Systems (CMSs). Developed in partnership with BetterGov, the Specification is the outcome of a multi-stage consultation process involving a wide range of stakeholders. Its primary aim is to simplify the procurement journey for Local Authorities by providing a clear and consistent guide—helping to reduce the time, cost, and resources required when selecting new CMSs.

# – micropost 23057


Endelvia Matt Mullenweg – is an interesting idea, offering “[p]ersonalized soundscapes to help you focus, relax, and sleep. Backed by neuroscience.”

I definitely work better when I have the right music playing – but £60 is too steep when i already have Apple Music and a bunch of suitable playlists identified.

# – micropost 23059


# – micropost 23060


Why WordPress Lost the Cool Kids (And How to Win Them Back):

Here’s what nobody talks about: WordPress is actually modern. REST API, GraphQL, headless implementations, React-based editing. It powers complex applications and handles millions of visitors. But everyone still thinks it’s “just for blogs.”

The platform regularly outperforms competitors on speed, but gets labeled as “slow and bloated.” Enterprise teams at Sony and Microsoft chose WordPress deliberately—these aren’t legacy installations.

WordPress has Full Site Editing and visual builders that compete with Webflow. They just feel hidden behind confusing historical interfaces.

# – micropost 23061


Another newsletter sent. Am pleased to be getting back into a fortnightly rhythm.

Some delivery issues though, need to have a look at my DNS records to ensure I have them set correctly.

If you’d like to sign up, you can do so!

# – micropost 23062


It isn’t altogether obvious how to send an email to the attendees of an upcoming Zoom meeting, without exporting their details and sending a normal email, which seems sub-optimal.

# – micropost 23063


The core problem in local government digital is capacity

This is the content of the ‘article’ element of the email newsletter I sent last week. Publishing here for posterity.


2025 has been a pretty tumultuous year in local government digital, largely due to the impact of the Localism bill in late 2024 and the imminent (and indeed immanent) prospect of local government reorganisation. Following the latest cabinet reshuffle, it feels like the ambitions might be being dialled back a little (note: I have no special insight other than what I read online), which probably isn’t a bad thing.
I can’t help but feel that some kind of coming together is required if the sector is to get the most out of the digital opportunity. I’ve been lucky enough to be involved in several research projects in the last year looking at some of the the big picture stuff, and to me the issue of capacity seems to be screaming out as the fundamental issue facing council digital teams across the country.
  • Local government software is largely terrible because nobody has the time to put the effort into demanding and buying something better.
  • Local government data is in a poorly maintained mess because nobody has the time to sort it out.
  • Local government websites are still full of unintelligible content and PDF forms because nobody has the time to get round to fixing it.
I could go on (but don’t have the time, LOL!) but you get my point – many of the oft-cited root causes of digital incompetence actually have a root cause themselves – capacity.
Have hundreds of councils trying to do the same thing, over and over again, is nuts, and there could have been some potential in using the LGR process to create some scalable teams to deal with the issue. Trouble is, LGR itself creates so much work that I dare say the opportunity wouldn’t be realised for some time.
I wrote a thing last autumn about how councils could start sharing digital, data, and technology capabilities in a way that doesn’t impact local policy setting or require huge sector-wide reform projects. Shared services have a bad rep in the sector, but it doesn’t have to be that way if we do things properly and take our time.
If LGR doesn’t end up happening as widely as once was expected, it would be nice to think that some of the conversations that have started up between digital people could still result in sharing capabilities, reducing burdens, and increasing capacity across the sector.

Localise Live! – monthly chats for local government folk

Join me for a light-hearted hour of sharing challenges, ideas, and experience about innovating in local public services.

Localise Live! takes place on the last Thursday of every month at 12pm until 1pm and is open to public sector people only. The sessions take place on Zoom, so make sure you have it downloaded and up to date!

Don’t worry if you can’t make them all, just sign up and pop along when you can.

Some sessions will have a predetermined topic to discuss, which you will be emailed about, and others will feature guests to share their ideas and knowledge with us. Sometimes we will just busk it on the day!

Sign up now to bag your place and get all the sessions added to your calendar: https://bit.ly/localiselive

See you there! 😀

On user groups for local government software

Have had a few conversations lately with local gov folk which bemoaned the lack of active user groups for most software systems. This is a problem! What could we do about it?

It seems like vendors are keen to say they have user groups, but then once the sale is made, less keen on convening them.

There’s real advantages in the people actually using software to get together to share insight, issues, collectivise around requests, and so on.

Is there a space, I wonder, for an independent user group as a service offering? Someone to provide a safe place for online discussions, organise regular meet-ups, do a bit of the admin, and maybe engage with the vendors to get them to turn up and so on. Question is probably ‘who pays?’.


Another little LinkedIn post / rant, which I am saving for posterity here.